Over the years, the question of whether there is life
elsewhere in the universe, has been receiving increased attention. This is partly because, in recent years,
astronomers have discovered that numerous stars in our galaxy have planets
orbiting them. The inference is then
plausible that, the more planets there are, the greater is the chance that some
of them may have life. Cascading from
there, more planets with life, may mean more planets with intelligent life, and
therefore, more planets with technologically advanced civilizations.
All that may, or may not, be true, but, the very basis of
the discussion is flawed from the start.
When discussing the probability of life elsewhere in the universe, a key
assumption is false. The assumption is
that, life arises by chance.
It doesn’t. Another
false part of the paradigm is that life is its chemical process. It isn’t.
If we assume that life in the universe arises by chance,
then we must also assume, as an underlying basis, that the universe itself
arises by chance. Additionally, we must
assume that the properties of the universe, those that make life possible, also
arise by chance. Cascading from there, we
must assume that there are myriad universes, collectively called a multi-verse,
perhaps infinities of them, and that all of that also arises by chance.
Now, wait just a minute here. At what point do we decide that all this is
too much of a stretch? Might not there
be a more simple paradigm, than infinite rolls of infinite dice?
Okay then, let’s consider the metaphorical dice, which
represent the laws of probability. There
is a huge problem with those dice, and the problem is that, in order for
probability to operate, it must do so within nonrandom parameters. For example, if one assumes that the
probability of a die-roll landing a six is one in six, then that assumes that
the die has six sides. But what
determines whether the die has six sides, or more, or less?
Dice are not produced with random numbers of sides. They are intentionally designed. The designer (manufacturer) decides how many
sides each die will have, and then he produces them accordingly.
Extrapolating from this, we can see that, at some point,
whether in the universe, a multi-verse, or a mega-multi-verse, the laws of
probability cannot operate, not unless first, there is an intentional design,
an assigned set of parameters, a given number of sides to the dice. Otherwise, chance means nothing. The probability of anything happening, when
probability has no meaning, is (at least colloquially) zero.
This brings us back to the question of whether there is life
elsewhere in the universe. If we are to
discuss this question in any meaningful sense, then we must leave chance out of
it. We must ask, instead, did the
designer of the universe give rise to life other than on our planet?
The chance of that, if one insists on thinking of it that
way, is either one-hundred-percent, or zero.
.
No comments:
Post a Comment