Friday, January 10, 2020

Noah’s Ark, Mythology and Science

.
The Biblical story of Noah’s ark is fairly well known to a very large portion of the population, including those who have little or no familiarity with the Bible.  Even those who do not believe it recognize the terms.  Worldwide, there are other myths of global, prehistoric catastrophe resembling the Noahic Flood. 


A point that is often missed in the story of Noah is the fact that, in one way or another, the earth has experienced what are referred to as evolutionary bottlenecks.  Some of these are geologically recent, for example the human population bottleneck of 70,000 years ago.  See


Prior to that event, there were several mass-extinction events, most famously the massive meteor strike that triggered the worldwide calamity that killed off all the dinosaurs.  There were other events as well.

What I wish to point out here is that the account of Noah’s Flood was written long before (as far as we know) there was any scientific knowledge of meteors, extinctions or population bottlenecks.  So were the myths, not only of extinctions, but of the Biblical war in heaven, which is somewhat mimicked in the Greek mythology of the Titans.

The point is that, even in ancient times, there seemed to be a widespread sense of an unseen history that predates modern humans.  Why should this be?

One idea is that there were books available that recorded these events, perhaps written by eye witnesses.  Two libraries that were destroyed were the one at Alexandria, Egypt, in 48 BC (exact year is disputed) and the Mayan Codices in 1562 AD.

There are other theories of prehistoric civilizations, one of them being that the Sphinx was constructed long before the rise of the Pharaohs, and that it was subjected to heavy rainfall before any such rain in Egypt’s written history. 


Even the great Pyramids at Giza contain the unsolved mystery of their technology and purpose.  (There is no evidence of interment of corpses.)  Standard theories of their construction by use of copper tools are considered implausible by many, and in fact, no one in modern times (AFAIK) has ever demonstrated how such tools could have produced the many thousands of precisely carved stones in the time frame necessary.  Indeed, attempts to make such demonstrations only undermine the standard theory, in the opinions of critics.

Furthermore, the pyramids contain numerous other mysteries, for example, the inclined passageway inside the structure, the lack of hieroglyphs where one would surely expect them, and the absence of any signs of soot, the product of torches, when no other means of illumination were known to exist.

No one of these mysteries is decisive in itself, but in the aggregate, it seems unreasonable to cobble together a credible theory that explains all of them.

Getting back to Noah’s ark, the Biblical story seems to be far more detailed than would seem necessary to someone concocting a myth.  The details of the maritime construction alone are impressive.  While some say that the myth was copied from earlier sources, the same details in those accounts would seem superfluous, unless they were true.

Moreover, the same author of the Ark story (presumably Moses) detailed the construction of an entirely different kind of ark, the Ark of the Covenant, in such exacting detail that modern engineers were able to construct a copy, and the copy exhibited some amazing electrical properties that fit the (also seemingly superfluous) Biblical story of a man touching the ark and being apparently electrocuted thereby.

Göbekli Tepe is another example of prehistoric technology that defies standard explanation on more than one account.  First, it was apparently built by hunter-gatherers, an implausible theory.  Second, it seems to have been buried after construction.  It is implausible that this was intentional, and more plausible that it occurred due to a natural catastrophe.


Undoubtedly (to me), the several surviving examples of ancient technology, including the amazing Anti-Kythera device, are proof that ancient societies, which we might consider to be technologically primitive, were in fact, capable of astounding technological achievements.  For example, when the Anti-Kythera mechanism was first found, many historians tried to explain it away using theories that were themselves less believable than the eventual, unavoidable explanation.

Nor are the things I have mentioned so far, isolated singularities.  There are too many to list here, so many in fact, that some have resorted to such easy excuses as space aliens, time travelers and other unnecessarily fantastic explanations that are worse than the normal theory, that a global catastrophe concealed or camouflaged an unwritten history of humanity.

Whether one believes in the Biblical account or not, of Noah’s ark, the accumulating evidence suggests that, at the very least, it (and other stories in the Torah) give us a window into a forgotten past.  It, along with other windows, provide an opportunity to open our minds to further research.
.

No comments:

Post a Comment