Among the
many attempts to explain how (or if) the brain gives rise to consciousness, the
analogy is often made, comparing the brain to a computer.
A simpler
analogy is to compare the brain to a camera.
Just as does a computer, the camera takes input (in this case, light
waves, photons) and converts them into an output, that is, a photograph.
However, the
camera has a lens. The purpose of the
lens is to take the input, the light waves, and focus them in such a manner
that the photograph will make sense to the person using the camera.
It would
make no sense, of course, for the camera to take in the light waves (the input)
only for its own use. The user must be
someone outside the camera.
Likewise,
whether we compare the brain to a computer or to a camera, it would make no
sense for the brain to take inputs (from neurons) without converting them to an
output—but an output for whom? If the
function of the brain is to process inputs and convert them to outputs, we must
ask, for whom is the output produced?
Of course,
the analogy involves even greater questions, including the design and
production of the device (be it camera, computer or brain), but for the purpose
of this commentary, we need focus only on the question, who is the user?
Our
conscious selves perceive that we are not our brains, but the users of our
brains. Just as music is not created by
the musical instrument, but instead requires a composer and a player, so also,
our thoughts come from outside our brain, and it is there that they are
processed. Just as your radio does not
produce music, but relays it to you by converting radio waves to sound, so
also, the brain does not produce consciousness.
Consciousness
is proof that we are not physical beings, but spiritual beings inhabiting a
physical body, in a physical world. We
travel through this world, but our home is the world of spirit.
.
No comments:
Post a Comment